Using nukes to stop nukes!
Saturday, April 08, 2006
US considers use of nuclear weapons against Iran
Seymour Hersh, in the New Yorker, once again writes about or insane foreign policies and adventure.
A senior unnamed Pentagon adviser is quoted in the article as saying that "this White House believes that the only way to solve the problem is to change the power structure in Iran, and that means war."At least there are some who tend towards sanity. But who will win this battle?
The former intelligence officials depicts planning as "enormous," "hectic" and "operational," Hersh writes.
One of the options under consideration involves the possible use of a bunker-buster tactical nuclear weapon, such as the B61-11, to insure the destruction of Iran's main centrifuge plant at Natanz, Hersh writes.
But the former senior intelligence official said the attention given to the nuclear option has created serious misgivings inside the military, and some officers have talked about resigning after an attempt to remove the nuclear option from the evolving war plans in Iran failed, according to the report.
"There are very strong sentiments within the military against brandishing nuclear weapons against other countries," the magazine quotes the Pentagon adviser as saying.
The adviser warned that bombing Iran could provoke "a chain reaction" of attacks on American facilities and citizens throughout the world and might also reignite Hezbollah.
"If we go, the southern half of Iraq will light up like a candle," the adviser is quoted as telling The New Yorker.
If W has his way, we may all be bending over and kissing our asses goodbye!
|